Virgin Fest has filed a lawsuit against WME and the touring companies of Lizzo, Ellie Goulding and Kali Uchis, demanding deposits paid prior to the event be returned
Sign up for IQ Index
The latest industry news to your inbox.
A California judge said the dispute is between the artists – Lizzo, Ellie Goulding and Kali Uchis – and the Virgin Fest organisers
By IQ on 16 Mar 2021
WME has been freed from Virgin Fest Los Angeles’ lawsuit seeking to recover prepaid deposits from the event’s cancelled 2020 edition.
VFLA Eventco LLC – Virgin Fest’s organiser and the music festival arm of Richard Branson’s Virgin Group – filed a lawsuit against the agency in July 2020, as well as artists Lizzo, Ellie Goulding and Kali Uchis, saying the parties had agreed to return deposits in the event of cancellation due to “an uncontrollable factor”.
The acts had been scheduled to play the debut outing of the festival at the Banc of California Stadium (22,000-cap.) and Exposition Park (160-acre) in LA on 6 and 7 June 2020 before it was cancelled due to the coronavirus pandemic.
VFLA argued that because the government prevented the festival from proceeding, the artists were obliged to return monies they had been advanced when they were booked to play.
The judge did allow a breach of contract claim to move forward against the artists’ touring companies
However, Lizzo, Goulding and their agents argued that they could keep those payments because they were still “ready, willing and able to perform”, despite the festival being called off. Uchis’ company did not file a demurrer but did file a notice of joinder to the other defendants’ demurrers.
According to VFLA, all other agencies have returned, or agreed to return, the full amount of the prepaid deposits for the performances.
On Friday (12 March), at the LA Superior Court, Judge Mark H. Epstein issued an order that said the agreements the parties signed protected WME from being sued for what is essentially a dispute between the artists and the promoter.
According to Law360, Epstein said the court “agrees with the plaintiff that the contract does not protect WME from liability for its own wrongs. It only protects WME from being sued for what is essentially a dispute between the artists and the promoter. But that is essentially what is at issue here.”
The judge did allow a breach of contract claim to move forward against the artists’ touring companies and also said that VFLA can amend its complaint against WME, which the agency objected to.
Get more stories like this in your inbox by signing up for IQ Index, IQ’s free email digest of essential live music industry news.